https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118459 Mid-term review of anti-dumping duty under section 9A(5) and Rule 23 requires objective material showing that dumping margin and injury have ceased, or that injury is unlikely to continue or recur. Injury assessment must consider import volume and price effects, non-injurious price, and the causal link under Rule 11 and Annexure II. Where landed import prices remain below the non-injurious price, price undercutting persists, and significant dumping continues, marginal improvements in domestic profitability or turnover do not justify revocation. Withdrawal of duty was therefore unsustainable, and the original duty continued for its remaining statutory term. en-us Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:41:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118459 Mid-term review of anti-dumping duty under section 9A(5) and Rule 23 requires objective material showing that dumping margin and injury have ceased, or that injury is unlikely to continue or recur. Injury assessment must consider import volume and price effects, non-injurious price, and the causal link under Rule 11 and Annexure II. Where landed import prices remain below the non-injurious price, price undercutting persists, and significant dumping continues, marginal improvements in domestic profitability or turnover do not justify revocation. Withdrawal of duty was therefore unsustainable, and the original duty continued for its remaining statutory term. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118459