<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 392 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified goods containing vitamins and other ingredients as medicaments under sub-heading 3003.10 due to their therapeutic or prophylactic use, marketing under brand names, and production under drug licenses. The decision aligned with precedents, allowing the appeals by the appellants and dismissing the department&#039;s appeal. The judgment provides clarity on classifying such products under the Customs Tariff Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 392 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified goods containing vitamins and other ingredients as medicaments under sub-heading 3003.10 due to their therapeutic or prophylactic use, marketing under brand names, and production under drug licenses. The decision aligned with precedents, allowing the appeals by the appellants and dismissing the department&#039;s appeal. The judgment provides clarity on classifying such products under the Customs Tariff Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>