<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 390 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118436</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellants, Spinning Mills, in a case concerning exemption availed under various Notifications. The Tribunal found that the yarn sold to Apex bodies met the criteria, dismissing allegations of sales to traders. Compliance with conditions, production of certificates for handloom use, and expert opinions supported the appellants. The burden of proof on actual use in the handloom industry lay with the revenue, absolving the Spinning Mills. The Tribunal granted the benefit of exemption, set aside penalties, and provided consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:04:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 390 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118436</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellants, Spinning Mills, in a case concerning exemption availed under various Notifications. The Tribunal found that the yarn sold to Apex bodies met the criteria, dismissing allegations of sales to traders. Compliance with conditions, production of certificates for handloom use, and expert opinions supported the appellants. The burden of proof on actual use in the handloom industry lay with the revenue, absolving the Spinning Mills. The Tribunal granted the benefit of exemption, set aside penalties, and provided consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>