<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 548 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118404</link>
    <description>The appeal involved various issues including the inclusion of interest received from customers in the total turnover for computing deductions under section 80HHC, the deletion of sales tax and excise duty from the total turnover, the addition on account of debt written off, and the allocation of common expenses of the head office to respective units. The Tribunal ruled against the assessee on the interest received from customers and in favor of the assessee on the deletion of sales tax and excise duty. The issue of addition on account of debt written off was remanded for further examination, and the allocation of common expenses was also sent back for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:34:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 548 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118404</link>
      <description>The appeal involved various issues including the inclusion of interest received from customers in the total turnover for computing deductions under section 80HHC, the deletion of sales tax and excise duty from the total turnover, the addition on account of debt written off, and the allocation of common expenses of the head office to respective units. The Tribunal ruled against the assessee on the interest received from customers and in favor of the assessee on the deletion of sales tax and excise duty. The issue of addition on account of debt written off was remanded for further examination, and the allocation of common expenses was also sent back for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>