<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 365 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118395</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission accepted the transaction value of the imported goods, settling the duty liability at Rs. 4,86,999. The applicant was granted immunity from fines, penalties, and prosecution. The Commission directed the refund of any excess amount deposited and highlighted that the settlement would be void if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 365 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118395</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission accepted the transaction value of the imported goods, settling the duty liability at Rs. 4,86,999. The applicant was granted immunity from fines, penalties, and prosecution. The Commission directed the refund of any excess amount deposited and highlighted that the settlement would be void if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>