<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 362 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118392</link>
    <description>Additional duty of excise on tea and tea waste was held not to carry an implied liability to interest on delayed payment where Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 incorporated Central Excise machinery only for refunds, exemptions and penalty. The applicable principle was that fiscal liability, including interest and penal consequences, must rest on clear legislative authority and cannot be created by implication from procedural incorporation alone. A precedent on similar statutory wording was treated as directly applicable, and the Revenue&#039;s attempt to recover interest on delayed payment therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:25:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 362 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118392</link>
      <description>Additional duty of excise on tea and tea waste was held not to carry an implied liability to interest on delayed payment where Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 incorporated Central Excise machinery only for refunds, exemptions and penalty. The applicable principle was that fiscal liability, including interest and penal consequences, must rest on clear legislative authority and cannot be created by implication from procedural incorporation alone. A precedent on similar statutory wording was treated as directly applicable, and the Revenue&#039;s attempt to recover interest on delayed payment therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>