<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 539 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118385</link>
    <description>Printed GI paper rolls used for wrapping remained classifiable under Heading 48.11 because that specific entry covered printed paper in rolls and the printing was only incidental to the goods&#039; wrapping function, not their essential character. The Tribunal also held that printing on duty-paid paper did not amount to manufacture, as no new commercially distinct product emerged; the goods retained their original utility as wrapping paper. On that basis, the printed rolls were not exigible to central excise duty merely by reason of printing or tariff placement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 539 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118385</link>
      <description>Printed GI paper rolls used for wrapping remained classifiable under Heading 48.11 because that specific entry covered printed paper in rolls and the printing was only incidental to the goods&#039; wrapping function, not their essential character. The Tribunal also held that printing on duty-paid paper did not amount to manufacture, as no new commercially distinct product emerged; the goods retained their original utility as wrapping paper. On that basis, the printed rolls were not exigible to central excise duty merely by reason of printing or tariff placement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>