<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 488 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118366</link>
    <description>Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act creates a special appellate route only for orders determining or reviewing the existence, degree, or effect of dumping or subsidy, and those appeals must be heard by a Special Bench. Where the appeal is not directed against such a determination, it does not fall within Section 9C. The appeal here related to anti-dumping duty but was not against an order determining dumping itself, so it was maintainable under the ordinary appellate jurisdiction in Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act and was to be placed before the Division Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 12:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 488 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118366</link>
      <description>Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act creates a special appellate route only for orders determining or reviewing the existence, degree, or effect of dumping or subsidy, and those appeals must be heard by a Special Bench. Where the appeal is not directed against such a determination, it does not fall within Section 9C. The appeal here related to anti-dumping duty but was not against an order determining dumping itself, so it was maintainable under the ordinary appellate jurisdiction in Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act and was to be placed before the Division Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>