<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 360 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118353</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, rejected the applicants&#039; plea for a refund of a deposited amount with interest from the Customs Department. Despite the prolonged delay in refund and the applicants&#039; arguments, the Tribunal determined it lacked jurisdiction to compel the department to repay the sum with interest. The rejection of the miscellaneous application was grounded in the Tribunal&#039;s limitations in enforcing such directives, resulting in the denial of the refund claim by the Customs Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 11:51:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 360 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118353</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, rejected the applicants&#039; plea for a refund of a deposited amount with interest from the Customs Department. Despite the prolonged delay in refund and the applicants&#039; arguments, the Tribunal determined it lacked jurisdiction to compel the department to repay the sum with interest. The rejection of the miscellaneous application was grounded in the Tribunal&#039;s limitations in enforcing such directives, resulting in the denial of the refund claim by the Customs Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>