https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118348 Recovered delivery challans and unretracted admissions were treated as sufficient evidence of clandestine removal of coated or laminated man-made fabrics, so the duty demand was sustained. Where part of the duty had been paid before issue of the show cause notice, the penalty under Section 11AC was restricted to the balance and reduced accordingly. The personal penalty under Rule 209A was not sustained on the recorded facts and was set aside. The note states that clandestine removal may be established by corroborative documents and admissions, and that pre-notice duty payment can limit the quantum of penalty. en-us Thu, 19 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2012 11:12:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118348 Recovered delivery challans and unretracted admissions were treated as sufficient evidence of clandestine removal of coated or laminated man-made fabrics, so the duty demand was sustained. Where part of the duty had been paid before issue of the show cause notice, the penalty under Section 11AC was restricted to the balance and reduced accordingly. The personal penalty under Rule 209A was not sustained on the recorded facts and was set aside. The note states that clandestine removal may be established by corroborative documents and admissions, and that pre-notice duty payment can limit the quantum of penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118348