<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 334 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118340</link>
    <description>In a mid-term anti-dumping review, revocation of duty must rest on material showing that dumping and injury will not recur, and cumulation is permissible only when the statutory preconditions are met. Imports from Bulgaria could not be cumulatively assessed because the related imports failed the minimum dumping-margin requirement; examined on their own, the record showed dumping, significant price undercutting and a real likelihood of renewed injury, so withdrawal of duty was set aside and duty was directed to continue. For Italy, the record showed a dumping margin but also higher landed values and improved domestic indicators, so withdrawal of duty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 10:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 334 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118340</link>
      <description>In a mid-term anti-dumping review, revocation of duty must rest on material showing that dumping and injury will not recur, and cumulation is permissible only when the statutory preconditions are met. Imports from Bulgaria could not be cumulatively assessed because the related imports failed the minimum dumping-margin requirement; examined on their own, the record showed dumping, significant price undercutting and a real likelihood of renewed injury, so withdrawal of duty was set aside and duty was directed to continue. For Italy, the record showed a dumping margin but also higher landed values and improved domestic indicators, so withdrawal of duty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>