<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 370 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118331</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that no Countervailing Duty (CVD) is applicable on the imported molybdenum concentrates since the process to obtain the concentrate does not qualify as manufacturing. The exemption under Notification No. 5/98-C.E. is applicable to these concentrates. Additionally, the short levy demand was deemed invalid as the assessment in the Bill of Entry was not contested. Consequently, the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 370 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118331</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that no Countervailing Duty (CVD) is applicable on the imported molybdenum concentrates since the process to obtain the concentrate does not qualify as manufacturing. The exemption under Notification No. 5/98-C.E. is applicable to these concentrates. Additionally, the short levy demand was deemed invalid as the assessment in the Bill of Entry was not contested. Consequently, the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>