<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118322</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1995-96, directing the Assessing Officer to compute the income accordingly. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of specifying the purpose of accumulation annually for unutilized income to meet the requirements for tax exemption under section 11(2) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118322</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1995-96, directing the Assessing Officer to compute the income accordingly. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of specifying the purpose of accumulation annually for unutilized income to meet the requirements for tax exemption under section 11(2) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>