<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 363 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, and directed the Customs authorities to refund the excess duty of Rs. 94,99,376 to the appellant. The Tribunal determined that the clerical error in currency conversion should be corrected under Section 154 of the Customs Act without requiring an appeal against the assessment order. It found that the appellant provided sufficient evidence that the duty incidence was not passed on to buyers, thereby negating the application of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 7-7-2006, mandating an expedited refund to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 363 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, and directed the Customs authorities to refund the excess duty of Rs. 94,99,376 to the appellant. The Tribunal determined that the clerical error in currency conversion should be corrected under Section 154 of the Customs Act without requiring an appeal against the assessment order. It found that the appellant provided sufficient evidence that the duty incidence was not passed on to buyers, thereby negating the application of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 7-7-2006, mandating an expedited refund to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>