<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 287 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118302</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the classification of &quot;corespun sewing threads&quot; under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s claim for classification under Heading 5401.10, finding that the product was made from filament yarn. Additionally, the tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate quantification of duty under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act and granted a stay on the operation of the impugned order until the classification issue was resolved. The decision underscored the significance of consistent and precise classification for fair outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:24:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 287 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118302</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the classification of &quot;corespun sewing threads&quot; under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s claim for classification under Heading 5401.10, finding that the product was made from filament yarn. Additionally, the tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate quantification of duty under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act and granted a stay on the operation of the impugned order until the classification issue was resolved. The decision underscored the significance of consistent and precise classification for fair outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>