https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118291 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai remanded a case back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication after an appeal against an earlier order. In subsequent proceedings, the Commissioner confirmed a demand for a five-year period, which the appellants contested. The Tribunal agreed with the appellants, ruling that the Commissioner exceeded the scope of de novo proceedings by confirming the entire demand, contrary to the earlier order. The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit the disputed amount within a timeframe and dispensed with pre-deposit of the balance, staying recovery during the appeal. en-us Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:54:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118291 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai remanded a case back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication after an appeal against an earlier order. In subsequent proceedings, the Commissioner confirmed a demand for a five-year period, which the appellants contested. The Tribunal agreed with the appellants, ruling that the Commissioner exceeded the scope of de novo proceedings by confirming the entire demand, contrary to the earlier order. The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit the disputed amount within a timeframe and dispensed with pre-deposit of the balance, staying recovery during the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118291