<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 310 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete both additions of excess liability and excessive rate of interest paid to creditors, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The Tribunal emphasized the pending nature of the liability dispute and the lack of evidence to establish its non-existence, as well as the justification provided by the assessee for the higher interest rates on unsecured loans. The consistent application of reasoning from previous decisions further supported the deletion of these additions in the current case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:48:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 310 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete both additions of excess liability and excessive rate of interest paid to creditors, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The Tribunal emphasized the pending nature of the liability dispute and the lack of evidence to establish its non-existence, as well as the justification provided by the assessee for the higher interest rates on unsecured loans. The consistent application of reasoning from previous decisions further supported the deletion of these additions in the current case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>