https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118282 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, confirming the clandestine removal of excisable goods. Evidence included intercepted goods, undisclosed machines and godowns, and corroborative statements. The company and its director faced penalties of Rs. 30,55,723/- and Rs. 1,00,000/-, respectively, with Rs. 20,00,400/- already appropriated. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties. en-us Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118282 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, confirming the clandestine removal of excisable goods. Evidence included intercepted goods, undisclosed machines and godowns, and corroborative statements. The company and its director faced penalties of Rs. 30,55,723/- and Rs. 1,00,000/-, respectively, with Rs. 20,00,400/- already appropriated. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118282