https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118268 Customs Notification No. 21/2002 was treated as extending concessional duty to ink cartridges, ribbon cartridges, ribbon gear cartridges and ribbon gear assemblies used in computer printers, without distinguishing between import with printers and import as separate goods. Section 19 of the Customs Act, 1962, which permits separate duty treatment where different articles in a set attract different rates, was held not to assist the Revenue on the facts recorded. Interim stay against the appellate order was therefore refused, and the Revenue's application was rejected. en-us Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:01:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118268 Customs Notification No. 21/2002 was treated as extending concessional duty to ink cartridges, ribbon cartridges, ribbon gear cartridges and ribbon gear assemblies used in computer printers, without distinguishing between import with printers and import as separate goods. Section 19 of the Customs Act, 1962, which permits separate duty treatment where different articles in a set attract different rates, was held not to assist the Revenue on the facts recorded. Interim stay against the appellate order was therefore refused, and the Revenue's application was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118268