<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 291 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118260</link>
    <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of penalties under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and granted interim relief. It noted an earlier decision supporting non-imposition of penalties in similar circumstances, while acknowledging a contrary view. The Tribunal also observed that a composite penalty imposed on the retired Superintendent under two independent provisions was not sustainable on a prima facie basis. To protect revenue pending final hearing, it directed that the disputed credit remain unutilised and the existing status quo be maintained until disposal of the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:26:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 291 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118260</link>
      <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of penalties under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and granted interim relief. It noted an earlier decision supporting non-imposition of penalties in similar circumstances, while acknowledging a contrary view. The Tribunal also observed that a composite penalty imposed on the retired Superintendent under two independent provisions was not sustainable on a prima facie basis. To protect revenue pending final hearing, it directed that the disputed credit remain unutilised and the existing status quo be maintained until disposal of the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>