<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 278 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118245</link>
    <description>On a waiver of pre-deposit application, CESTAT granted stay of demand pending appeal after noting that duty had been confirmed on alleged non-accountal of yarn in one 100% EOU and excess stock in another EOU. The Tribunal relied on the recorded shortage in one unit, corresponding excess in the other, and the appellant&#039;s prior intimation to the Revenue that about 75 MT of moth- and mildew-infested yarn had been stored in the other unit. The order confined itself to interim relief and did not decide the merits of the duty demand, but waived pre-deposit of duty and penalty for hearing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:42:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 278 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118245</link>
      <description>On a waiver of pre-deposit application, CESTAT granted stay of demand pending appeal after noting that duty had been confirmed on alleged non-accountal of yarn in one 100% EOU and excess stock in another EOU. The Tribunal relied on the recorded shortage in one unit, corresponding excess in the other, and the appellant&#039;s prior intimation to the Revenue that about 75 MT of moth- and mildew-infested yarn had been stored in the other unit. The order confined itself to interim relief and did not decide the merits of the duty demand, but waived pre-deposit of duty and penalty for hearing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>