<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 276 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118242</link>
    <description>Embroidered fabrics were held to disclose a strong prima facie case for classification under Heading 58.05 rather than Chapter Heading 54.06, based on the nature of the goods and the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view supporting that classification. On that interim footing, the material on record was sufficient to justify dispensing with pre-deposit and granting stay of recovery pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:30:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 276 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118242</link>
      <description>Embroidered fabrics were held to disclose a strong prima facie case for classification under Heading 58.05 rather than Chapter Heading 54.06, based on the nature of the goods and the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view supporting that classification. On that interim footing, the material on record was sufficient to justify dispensing with pre-deposit and granting stay of recovery pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>