<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 262 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118228</link>
    <description>Imported re-melted zinc ingots could not be valued by reference to electrolytic high grade zinc ingots because the goods were of a different grade and purity. The record showed that zinc is traded in distinct grades, and the appellant&#039;s consignments were closer to other re-melted zinc imports than to special high grade zinc. A valuation exercise based on dissimilar goods was impermissible, and the transaction value could not be rejected on that comparison. The Revenue&#039;s own material supported adoption of the lowest comparable transaction value, including re-melted zinc imports near the declared price. The Commissioner&#039;s valuation was therefore unsustainable and the appellants succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 262 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118228</link>
      <description>Imported re-melted zinc ingots could not be valued by reference to electrolytic high grade zinc ingots because the goods were of a different grade and purity. The record showed that zinc is traded in distinct grades, and the appellant&#039;s consignments were closer to other re-melted zinc imports than to special high grade zinc. A valuation exercise based on dissimilar goods was impermissible, and the transaction value could not be rejected on that comparison. The Revenue&#039;s own material supported adoption of the lowest comparable transaction value, including re-melted zinc imports near the declared price. The Commissioner&#039;s valuation was therefore unsustainable and the appellants succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>