<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 261 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118227</link>
    <description>Customs valuation of a second-hand imported car followed the declared transaction value because the sale was genuine, involved an unrelated seller, and no recognised exception justified rejecting the invoice price. Post-import depreciation for delay in customs clearance was impermissible because valuation under the Customs Act must be based on the price at the time of importation, and hardship from detention does not alter that statutory basis. The assessment therefore proceeded on the declared transaction value without allowance for depreciation after import.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:15:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 261 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118227</link>
      <description>Customs valuation of a second-hand imported car followed the declared transaction value because the sale was genuine, involved an unrelated seller, and no recognised exception justified rejecting the invoice price. Post-import depreciation for delay in customs clearance was impermissible because valuation under the Customs Act must be based on the price at the time of importation, and hardship from detention does not alter that statutory basis. The assessment therefore proceeded on the declared transaction value without allowance for depreciation after import.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>