<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 267 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete all disallowances made by the Assessing Officer, including car running, telephone, Diwali, travelling, sales promotion, and subscription expenses. The Tribunal found the expenses were justified for business purposes, consistent with prior rulings, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was rendered on 2-6-2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:56:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 267 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete all disallowances made by the Assessing Officer, including car running, telephone, Diwali, travelling, sales promotion, and subscription expenses. The Tribunal found the expenses were justified for business purposes, consistent with prior rulings, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was rendered on 2-6-2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>