<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 331 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the direction to make payment of duty from the PLA account, as duty had already been paid from the Cenvat account. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The absence of the appellant&#039;s counsel was accepted, and the appeal was restored. The judgment was pronounced in Open Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 331 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the direction to make payment of duty from the PLA account, as duty had already been paid from the Cenvat account. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The absence of the appellant&#039;s counsel was accepted, and the appeal was restored. The judgment was pronounced in Open Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>