<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 327 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118202</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the duty demand and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore, amounting to approximately Rs. 2.2 crores on a 100% Export Oriented Unit for discrepancies in stock and false claims of goods sent for job work and export. The Tribunal found evidence of fraud and false documents, leading to the directive for the first appellant to deposit Rs. One crore towards duty and Rs. 50 lakhs towards penalty, and the second appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs. Compliance with the pre-deposits would result in the waiver of the remaining amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:50:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 327 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118202</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the duty demand and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore, amounting to approximately Rs. 2.2 crores on a 100% Export Oriented Unit for discrepancies in stock and false claims of goods sent for job work and export. The Tribunal found evidence of fraud and false documents, leading to the directive for the first appellant to deposit Rs. One crore towards duty and Rs. 50 lakhs towards penalty, and the second appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs. Compliance with the pre-deposits would result in the waiver of the remaining amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>