<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 261 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118196</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the amount of Rs. 1,71,35,268 should be included in the computation of business profit for section 80HHC, as it was deemed income under section 41(1) and integral to the overall business profit computation. The tribunal found that the exclusion provision in section 80HHC did not apply. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 08:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 261 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118196</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the amount of Rs. 1,71,35,268 should be included in the computation of business profit for section 80HHC, as it was deemed income under section 41(1) and integral to the overall business profit computation. The tribunal found that the exclusion provision in section 80HHC did not apply. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>