<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 258 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, deleting the additions of Rs. 12,18,500 and Rs. 1,37,750. The judgment emphasized that assessments must be based on legitimate material and not on mere suspicion or past history. The Tribunal relied on the Orissa High Court&#039;s decision to reinforce that past events alone cannot justify additions for subsequent assessment years without contemporaneous evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 258 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, deleting the additions of Rs. 12,18,500 and Rs. 1,37,750. The judgment emphasized that assessments must be based on legitimate material and not on mere suspicion or past history. The Tribunal relied on the Orissa High Court&#039;s decision to reinforce that past events alone cannot justify additions for subsequent assessment years without contemporaneous evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>