<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 253 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118171</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80-IA was held allowable where the assessee retained control over manufacture, supplied technical inputs, supervised production, and marketed the products under its own brand, even though the work was carried out through loan licensee manufacturers who were not separately eligible. The incentive applied to the assessee&#039;s manufacturing activity as a whole, so disallowance on that ground was rejected. In the block assessment context, an amount could not be treated as undisclosed income under Chapter XIV-B merely on the basis of a retracted admission when search operations yielded no incriminating material. Without search-based evidence of concealment, the regular book entry could not be converted into block-assessment income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 253 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118171</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80-IA was held allowable where the assessee retained control over manufacture, supplied technical inputs, supervised production, and marketed the products under its own brand, even though the work was carried out through loan licensee manufacturers who were not separately eligible. The incentive applied to the assessee&#039;s manufacturing activity as a whole, so disallowance on that ground was rejected. In the block assessment context, an amount could not be treated as undisclosed income under Chapter XIV-B merely on the basis of a retracted admission when search operations yielded no incriminating material. Without search-based evidence of concealment, the regular book entry could not be converted into block-assessment income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>