<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 515 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118163</link>
    <description>Transaction value of imported goods must be accepted under the amended customs valuation regime unless the specific grounds for rejection in Rule 4(2) are established. Where the declared price is supported by a contract, the import falls within the contracted period, and there is no evidence of related-party dealing, extra-commercial consideration, or additional payment, the declared value cannot be displaced by contemporaneous import prices. The residual valuation method cannot be invoked inconsistently before the preceding valuation rules, including the rule for identical goods, have failed. On these facts, the assessable value was properly based on the contracted price, subject only to the importer&#039;s voluntary marginal enhancement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 515 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118163</link>
      <description>Transaction value of imported goods must be accepted under the amended customs valuation regime unless the specific grounds for rejection in Rule 4(2) are established. Where the declared price is supported by a contract, the import falls within the contracted period, and there is no evidence of related-party dealing, extra-commercial consideration, or additional payment, the declared value cannot be displaced by contemporaneous import prices. The residual valuation method cannot be invoked inconsistently before the preceding valuation rules, including the rule for identical goods, have failed. On these facts, the assessable value was properly based on the contracted price, subject only to the importer&#039;s voluntary marginal enhancement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>