<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 512 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118159</link>
    <description>The appeal against the confirmation of interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the appellants were liable to pay interest in addition to duty as per Section 11AB, despite their voluntary payment of the differential duty before receiving any notice. The Tribunal distinguished a precedent cited by the appellants, stating it was not applicable to the case at hand. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the confirmation of interest under Section 11AB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 512 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118159</link>
      <description>The appeal against the confirmation of interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the appellants were liable to pay interest in addition to duty as per Section 11AB, despite their voluntary payment of the differential duty before receiving any notice. The Tribunal distinguished a precedent cited by the appellants, stating it was not applicable to the case at hand. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the confirmation of interest under Section 11AB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>