<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 511 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118157</link>
    <description>Prima facie waiver of pre-deposit depends on both a substantial case on merits and demonstrated hardship. In this CESTAT note on differential duty and penalties, the Tribunal found serious doubt over the department&#039;s reliance on mutuality of interest, non-compete fee treatment, and alleged technical know-how transfer, but held that the appellants had still not shown a sufficiently strong prima facie case for complete waiver. Financial hardship was also considered from the audited losses, yet complete waiver was declined. The Tribunal required deposit of 10% of the duty demanded and granted waiver of the balance pre-deposit and stay of recovery on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:45:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 511 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118157</link>
      <description>Prima facie waiver of pre-deposit depends on both a substantial case on merits and demonstrated hardship. In this CESTAT note on differential duty and penalties, the Tribunal found serious doubt over the department&#039;s reliance on mutuality of interest, non-compete fee treatment, and alleged technical know-how transfer, but held that the appellants had still not shown a sufficiently strong prima facie case for complete waiver. Financial hardship was also considered from the audited losses, yet complete waiver was declined. The Tribunal required deposit of 10% of the duty demanded and granted waiver of the balance pre-deposit and stay of recovery on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>