<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 509 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118155</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the impugned order as the goods were auctioned by the Port Trust and there was no likelihood of the container being taken out of the port area by the Appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:43:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 509 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118155</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the impugned order as the goods were auctioned by the Port Trust and there was no likelihood of the container being taken out of the port area by the Appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>