<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 503 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118145</link>
    <description>The judge partially allowed the appeals, overturning the orders-in-appeal that set aside the duty demands. However, the judge ruled in favor of the respondents regarding the redemption fine and penalties, setting aside the confiscation orders due to the respondents&#039; provision of end use certificates for the goods received and consumed for manufacturing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:09:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 503 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118145</link>
      <description>The judge partially allowed the appeals, overturning the orders-in-appeal that set aside the duty demands. However, the judge ruled in favor of the respondents regarding the redemption fine and penalties, setting aside the confiscation orders due to the respondents&#039; provision of end use certificates for the goods received and consumed for manufacturing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>