<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 481 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118144</link>
    <description>The court upheld the demand for customs duty and the confiscation of the CT scanner under Section 111(o) due to non-fulfillment of conditions under Notification No. 64/88-Cus. However, the penalty imposed under Section 114A was set aside as it could not be applied retrospectively. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 35 lakhs to Rs. 20 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 481 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118144</link>
      <description>The court upheld the demand for customs duty and the confiscation of the CT scanner under Section 111(o) due to non-fulfillment of conditions under Notification No. 64/88-Cus. However, the penalty imposed under Section 114A was set aside as it could not be applied retrospectively. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 35 lakhs to Rs. 20 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>