<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 349 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118132</link>
    <description>A non-resident&#039;s Indian permanent establishment was found to have performed only limited negotiation and support functions, so profit attribution was restricted to 8% of turnover rather than the higher estimate proposed by the Revenue. Software licensing receipts were held not to be royalty because the licensee obtained only a restricted right to use the software and no rights in the underlying copyright; the amounts were treated as business profits from a copyrighted article. Interest under sections 234A and 234B was also not sustained for the non-resident, following the view that advance tax liability did not arise where tax was deductible at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 349 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118132</link>
      <description>A non-resident&#039;s Indian permanent establishment was found to have performed only limited negotiation and support functions, so profit attribution was restricted to 8% of turnover rather than the higher estimate proposed by the Revenue. Software licensing receipts were held not to be royalty because the licensee obtained only a restricted right to use the software and no rights in the underlying copyright; the amounts were treated as business profits from a copyrighted article. Interest under sections 234A and 234B was also not sustained for the non-resident, following the view that advance tax liability did not arise where tax was deductible at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>