<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 469 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118122</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI rejected the application for rectification of mistake. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority to assess the refund claim based on principles of unjust enrichment, as required by law before refund sanctioning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:14:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 469 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118122</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI rejected the application for rectification of mistake. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority to assess the refund claim based on principles of unjust enrichment, as required by law before refund sanctioning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>