<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 303 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118104</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found the payments reasonable and justified based on qualifications and contributions of employees. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of the CBDT circular on tax effect for filing appeals, aiming to reduce unnecessary litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:06:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 303 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118104</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found the payments reasonable and justified based on qualifications and contributions of employees. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of the CBDT circular on tax effect for filing appeals, aiming to reduce unnecessary litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>