<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 246 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118102</link>
    <description>The case involved conflicting decisions by different Benches of the Tribunal regarding variations in the value of vessels for customs duty determination through addenda to the original memorandum of agreement. The Tribunal decided to refer the matter to a Larger Bench to resolve the conflict and provide clarity on customs valuation based on addenda to the original agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 246 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118102</link>
      <description>The case involved conflicting decisions by different Benches of the Tribunal regarding variations in the value of vessels for customs duty determination through addenda to the original memorandum of agreement. The Tribunal decided to refer the matter to a Larger Bench to resolve the conflict and provide clarity on customs valuation based on addenda to the original agreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>