<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 251 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that customs duty was not applicable on the fire float manufactured in India under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. They emphasized that the absence of an export condition in the notification meant no duty was chargeable. The Tribunal found no requirement for export of goods manufactured in India under the notification, distinguishing the case from Mustan Taherbhai. The previous order granting duty exemption for goods manufactured in bonded premises was referenced, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 251 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that customs duty was not applicable on the fire float manufactured in India under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. They emphasized that the absence of an export condition in the notification meant no duty was chargeable. The Tribunal found no requirement for export of goods manufactured in India under the notification, distinguishing the case from Mustan Taherbhai. The previous order granting duty exemption for goods manufactured in bonded premises was referenced, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>