https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118078 Supplementary invoices issued for differential duty arising from an incorrect duty computation and undervaluation were not treated as prima facie ineligible documents for availing credit. On the material before CESTAT, there was no prima facie basis to reject the credit claim at the interim stage, so insistence on further pre-deposit was unwarranted. The appellant was therefore granted waiver of further pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending final hearing. en-us Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:06:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118078 Supplementary invoices issued for differential duty arising from an incorrect duty computation and undervaluation were not treated as prima facie ineligible documents for availing credit. On the material before CESTAT, there was no prima facie basis to reject the credit claim at the interim stage, so insistence on further pre-deposit was unwarranted. The appellant was therefore granted waiver of further pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending final hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118078