<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 245 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118074</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata allowed the petition as recoveries under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act were not covered under Section 35F, hence no predeposit was required. The application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:56:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 245 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118074</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata allowed the petition as recoveries under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act were not covered under Section 35F, hence no predeposit was required. The application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>