<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 240 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant in the case, reducing the duty liability amount based on rental charges and affirming the inclusion of distributor&#039;s commission in the transaction value. An interim stay was granted upon the appellant depositing a specified amount within six weeks, with non-compliance leading to dismissal of the appeals. The remaining balance of duty and penalty would be waived upon deposit, and a compliance reporting date was set for July 3, 2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 240 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant in the case, reducing the duty liability amount based on rental charges and affirming the inclusion of distributor&#039;s commission in the transaction value. An interim stay was granted upon the appellant depositing a specified amount within six weeks, with non-compliance leading to dismissal of the appeals. The remaining balance of duty and penalty would be waived upon deposit, and a compliance reporting date was set for July 3, 2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>