<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 238 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118067</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 5,000. While acknowledging the appellant&#039;s first-time implication and lack of personal benefit, the Tribunal found his involvement in processing papers warranted a monetary penalty for breaching duties as a Customs House Agent (CHA) agent. The judgment stressed the importance of diligently fulfilling obligations, proper verification, and adherence to customs clearance procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:20:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 238 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118067</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 5,000. While acknowledging the appellant&#039;s first-time implication and lack of personal benefit, the Tribunal found his involvement in processing papers warranted a monetary penalty for breaching duties as a Customs House Agent (CHA) agent. The judgment stressed the importance of diligently fulfilling obligations, proper verification, and adherence to customs clearance procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>