<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 237 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and determined the redemption fine and penalty for the unauthorized import of marble blocks in contravention of the Exim policy. Emphasizing that discretion for higher penalties should be reserved for repeated offenses, the Tribunal set the redemption fine at Rs. 12.50 Lakhs and the penalty at Rs. 3.25 Lakhs, within statutory limits. The decision considered previous cases and the need for deterrence, ensuring adherence to legal provisions while maintaining consistency in customs violation penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:18:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 237 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and determined the redemption fine and penalty for the unauthorized import of marble blocks in contravention of the Exim policy. Emphasizing that discretion for higher penalties should be reserved for repeated offenses, the Tribunal set the redemption fine at Rs. 12.50 Lakhs and the penalty at Rs. 3.25 Lakhs, within statutory limits. The decision considered previous cases and the need for deterrence, ensuring adherence to legal provisions while maintaining consistency in customs violation penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>