<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 232 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that adjusting refunds against non-final demands was illegal. It affirmed the applicability of Section 11BB for interest on delayed refunds and emphasized compliance with Board Circulars prohibiting coercive recovery actions. The Tribunal granted consequential relief, underscoring that refunds should not be adjusted against appealable demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 232 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that adjusting refunds against non-final demands was illegal. It affirmed the applicability of Section 11BB for interest on delayed refunds and emphasized compliance with Board Circulars prohibiting coercive recovery actions. The Tribunal granted consequential relief, underscoring that refunds should not be adjusted against appealable demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>