https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118058 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to the specific nature of the order issued by the Assistant Commissioner, which did not qualify it as an order of the Commissioner despite the approval obtained. The judgment clarified the distinction between orders originating from Assistant Commissioners and those communicated by them on behalf of higher officials, establishing the proper forum for appealing such orders within the excise legal framework. en-us Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:55:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118058 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to the specific nature of the order issued by the Assistant Commissioner, which did not qualify it as an order of the Commissioner despite the approval obtained. The judgment clarified the distinction between orders originating from Assistant Commissioners and those communicated by them on behalf of higher officials, establishing the proper forum for appealing such orders within the excise legal framework. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118058