<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 229 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118055</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to forfeit the security of Rs. 60,000 imposed on a Customs House Agent under the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations, 2004. The Tribunal found the agent accountable for the actions of its employee, who engaged in misconduct by forging documents and signatures to clear goods. Despite dropping other charges, the Tribunal affirmed the forfeiture of security, emphasizing the agent&#039;s responsibility for the employee&#039;s actions in customs matters. The appeal was rejected, and the forfeiture of security was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:45:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 229 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118055</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to forfeit the security of Rs. 60,000 imposed on a Customs House Agent under the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations, 2004. The Tribunal found the agent accountable for the actions of its employee, who engaged in misconduct by forging documents and signatures to clear goods. Despite dropping other charges, the Tribunal affirmed the forfeiture of security, emphasizing the agent&#039;s responsibility for the employee&#039;s actions in customs matters. The appeal was rejected, and the forfeiture of security was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>