<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 599 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that unabsorbed depreciation should be deducted when computing business profits for section 80HHE, but brought forward business losses should not be deducted. Additionally, the profit under section 41(1) should be included in eligible business profits for the deduction under section 80HHE. The eligible profit for deduction was determined to be Rs. 72,78,339, not Rs. 35,15,070 as initially calculated by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:26:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 599 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that unabsorbed depreciation should be deducted when computing business profits for section 80HHE, but brought forward business losses should not be deducted. Additionally, the profit under section 41(1) should be included in eligible business profits for the deduction under section 80HHE. The eligible profit for deduction was determined to be Rs. 72,78,339, not Rs. 35,15,070 as initially calculated by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>